It turns out it’s hard to write poetry, at least good poetry. But even so, many efforts seem to focus more on the words than on the poem. Job 38:36 is an interesting example, because no one knows for sure what the words there mean, particularly tuchot and sechvi. Still, the poetic nature of the…
Read more
John Hobbins has an interesting analysis of near-parallel passages in Mark 1:16-18 and Matthew 4:18-20. I’m struck by the fact that I can’t find a translation that makes it possible to follow along in English. (I have a table below.) The KJV, for reasons I can’t fathom, adds the word “Jesus” to Matthew, and it…
Read more
Recents discussions (on Dr. Jim West’s blog, ScriptureZealot, etc.) have focused on what to do with Greek pronouns in English. But the discussion seem to gloss over the fact that subject pronouns are generally missing in Greek. So instead of “he said,” Greek offers us just eipen “said.” It can be “he said,” “she said,”…
Read more
I’ll admit. I had an agenda when I composed my last post. And the agenda is this: The Greek pateres is one of the words that has more than one correct translation into English. Among the reasonable possibilities are “fathers,” “parents,” and “ancestors.” For example, in Ephesians 6:4 (and Colossians 3:21) it is clearly male…
Read more
It’s hardly surprising that ancient words don’t match up perfectly with modern English ones. To pick one example out of thousands, the Hebrew kol is variously “sound” or “voice” (and the Greek translation fone is even broader, including “word” and somtimes “language”). In Genesis 27:22, Isaac hears Jacob’s kol; and in Psalm 47:5, we read…
Read more
Comments like, “Even if you remove the male pronouns, is the Bible not still a patriarchal text?” (from a comment on Rumblings) and observations such as those from Mark Stevens that the T-NIV has been “unfarily criticized” for its gender neutrality make it clear to me that people are using “gender inclusivity” and “gender neutrality”…
Read more
Recent posts from my Ancient Wisdom, Modern Lives:
